Monday, December 31, 2012

Budget battle sends mixed signals on health care

President Barack Obama speaks to reporters in the Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House in Washington after meeting with Congressional leaders regarding the fiscal cliff, Friday, Dec. 28, 2012. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

President Barack Obama speaks to reporters in the Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House in Washington after meeting with Congressional leaders regarding the fiscal cliff, Friday, Dec. 28, 2012. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

WASHINGTON (AP) ? Confused about the federal budget struggle? So are doctors, hospital administrators and other medical professionals who serve the 100 million Americans covered by Medicare and Medicaid.

Rarely has the government sent so many conflicting signals in so short a time about the bottom line for the health care industry.

Cuts are coming, says Washington, and some could be really big. Yet more government spending is also being promised as President Barack Obama's health care overhaul advances and millions of uninsured people move closer to getting government-subsidized coverage.

"Imagine a person being told they are going to get a raise, but their taxes are also going to go up and they are going to be paying more for gas," said Thornton Kirby, president of the South Carolina Hospital Association. "They don't know if they are going to be taking home more or less. That's the uncertainty when there are so many variables in play."

Real money is at stake for big hospitals and small medical practices alike. Government at all levels pays nearly half the nation's health care tab, with federal funds accounting for most of that.

It's widely assumed that a budget deal will mean cuts for Medicare service providers. But which ones? How much? And will Medicaid and subsidies to help people get coverage under the health care law also be cut?

As House Speaker John Boehner famously said: "God only knows." The Ohio Republican was referring to the overall chances of getting a budget deal, but the same can be said of how health care ? one-sixth of the economy ? will fare.

"There is no political consensus to do anything significant," said Dan Mendelson, president of Avalere Health, a market analysis firm. "There is a collective walking away from things that matter. All the stuff on the lists of options becomes impossible, because there is no give-and-take."

As if things weren't complicated enough, doctors keep facing their own recurring fiscal cliff, separate from the bigger budget battle but embroiled in it nonetheless.

Come Jan. 1, doctors and certain other medical professionals face a 26.5 percent cut in their Medicare payments, the consequence of a 1990s deficit-reduction law gone awry. Lawmakers failed to repeal or replace that law even after it became obvious that it wasn't working. Instead, Congress usually passes a "doc fix" each year to waive the cuts.

This year, the fix got hung up in larger budget politics. Although a reprieve is expected sooner or later, doctors don't like being told to sit in the congressional waiting room.

"It seems like there is a presumption that physicians and patients can basically tolerate this kind of uncertainty while the Congress goes through whatever political machinations they are going through," said Dr. Jeremy Lazarus, president of the American Medical Association. "Our concern is that physician uncertainty and anxiety about being able to pay the bills will have an impact on taking care of patients."

A recent government survey indicates that Medicare beneficiaries are having more problems when trying to find a new primary care doctor, and Lazarus said that will only get worse.

Adding to their unease, doctors also face an additional reduction if automatic spending cuts go through. Those would be triggered if Obama and congressional leaders are unable to bridge partisan differences and strike a deal. They are part of the combination of tax increases and spending cuts dubbed the "fiscal cliff."

Medicare service providers would get hit with a 2 percent across-the-board cut, but Medicaid and subsidies for the uninsured under Obama's health care overhaul would be spared. The Medicare cut adds up to about $120 billion over ten years, with 40 percent falling on hospitals, according to Avalare's analysis. Nursing homes, Medicare Advantage plans and home health agencies also get hit.

The American Hospital Association says that would lead to the loss of hundreds of thousands of hospital jobs in a labor intensive industry that also generates employment for other businesses in local communities.

"It's very difficult to believe hospitals can absorb the kinds of numbers they are talking about without reducing service or workforce," said Kirby, the hospital association head. "You may decide that a service a hospital provides is not affordable ? for example, obstetrics in a rural community ? if you're making a little bit of money or losing a little bit of money by continuing to deliver babies in a rural community."

Independent analysts like Mendelson doubt that a 2 percent Medicare cut to hospitals would be catastrophic but say it will cost jobs somewhere.

Even if there is a budget deal, the squeeze will be on.

The administration has proposed $400 billion in health care cuts so far in the budget talks, coming mainly from Medicare spending. That's only a starting point as far as Republicans are concerned. They also want to pare back Medicaid and Obama's health care law and have also sought an increase in the eligibility age for Medicare.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/89ae8247abe8493fae24405546e9a1aa/Article_2012-12-29-Fiscal%20Cliff-Health%20Care/id-0f79321a536a48e089c9c44aed43ff3f

trisomy 18 ozzie guillen ozzie guillen buster posey eric holder eric holder carole king

Friday, December 28, 2012

The Departed

The Departed

Rep. Steven C. LaTourette (R-Ohio), Rep. Brad Miller (D-N.C.), and Rep. Hansen Clarke (D-Mich.)

Photo by Paul Morigi/Getty Images for Ovation; Photo by Andy Kropa/Getty Images; MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images

The next House of Representatives will contain 233 Republicans, 200 Democrats, and 80 freshmen. Redistricting, primaries, and retirements have culled a few centuries? worth of political experience. So in November and December, I talked to a few representative soon-to-be-former congressmen about what it?s been like to serve in an institution 85 percent of Americans can?t stand. Excerpts of their thoughts follow.

Rep. Steven LaTourette was elected in the 1994 Republican wave, taking over a seat in the eastern suburbs of Cleveland. On paper, Democrats occasionally sketched theories of how he could be beat. But they never got close. LaTourette established himself as a pragmatic conservative and ally of John Boehner, there when the party needed him, and there to shame extremists when they blew up a compromise. Last week, after Boehner?s conference refused to pass a fiscal cliff ?Plan B,? LaTourette told reporters that the ?continued dumbing-down of the Republican Party? had done them in. He?d decided to retire months ago.

  • The campaign against earmarks really started with Jeff Flake. He?d pick out the ones that had the funniest names, and force votes on them, before we could vote on spending bills. At the outset, he?d lose 300 or more votes, and the exercise seemed pretty much impotent. It never really got legs until the ?Bridge to Nowhere,? probably, in 2005. That became the symbol for earmarks. It became a symbol beyond a big amount of money going to a home state. It was something going to for-profit entities.
  • Anytime you?re explaining, you?re losing. You can explain Article 1 Section 7 of the Constitution. You can explain that this money will be appropriated whether or not members of Congress earmark it. But this new class that came in, in the last Congress, they?re looking around, they see the stimulus package, they see the administration handing out tiger grants or whatever it may be, 70 percent of them go into districts controlled by Democrats, and [these freshmen Republicans] stop earmarks. Eventually they want to rescue some scenic area in the district, and they?re told that earmarks were the way to do that. They say: Oh, I didn?t realize that.
  • We have too many ?message? votes. I don?t need to have a vote on abortion every month, a vote on guns every month. I have a good relationship with labor. Labor wants one thing: Davis-Bacon. And these new guys, no matter what the bill was, wanted to put repeal of Davis-Bacon in it. It didn?t bother me, but it might have bothered some of the freshmen. Is anybody confused that someone from North Carolina or Georgia is right-to-work? No. Then why have the vote?
  • You?ve had people for a generation running against the Congress. It?s not just enough that you have an honest disagreement with the Democrats. You have these groups?Heritage Action, Club for Growth?shooting at Republicans. It?s a constant pounding, people saying, ?You?re a RINO, you sold us out.? The Red State blog guys, I know that after I announced, they wrote: ?Best news of the century, LaTourette to retire.? How could that be the best news of the century?
  • The best day I can remember here was when we passed the Balanced Budget Amendment in the House. I recall getting somewhat emotional over that. Between 1996 and 1998 you get welfare reform, you kick out a major highway bill. You get a lot of good work done, and it was because Bill Clinton was willing to triangulate the Democrats. He?d actually reach out and talk to us. This president doesn?t work with us at all.
  • The Clinton impeachment was one of those things?and both parties do this?where we overplayed our hand. Public opinion was not treating President Clinton well, but it seemed like we had to go and make sure that people knew what he did. That?s always our tendency on these things?you want to jump in. But the American people love an underdog. It turns when they think you?re turning on President Clinton, they turn to him. It just had to go the way it went. People were too invested. When it left here, and it went to the Senate, there was no way the United States Senate would remove the president from office. So America got treated to this horrible display, and it wasn?t one of our better moments. President Clinton would have suffered, I think, in terms of popularity and his agenda, if we?d just left him alone.
  • This fiscal cliff thing is the most foreseeable crisis in American history. People had time to put together solutions. There just wasn?t a lot of good work done. I don?t care how good the deal is, if Grover Norquist says it?s a tax increase, you?re going to have 40 to 120 Republicans voting against it. If it touches Medicare and Social Security, you?re going to have Democrats running against it. I think this was why, when I said I was going to retire, people were coming up to me and saying: ?I wish I would have done that.? Or, ?This is my last term.? There?s a high build-up of frustration in the way things are going.

Rep. Brad Miller got to Congress when the North Carolina Democratic party was still dominant. In 2001, as a state senator, Miller got a say in congressional redistricting. In 2002, he got to play for a seat that was ideal for him, capturing slices of the booming ?research triangle.? After the 2008 crash, Miller spent the bulk of his time on financial reform and ?cram-down? legislation that would have limited the costs for people stuck with bad mortgages. But in 2010, Republicans took over the legislature and drew a new map designed to squeeze out Miller and three other white Democrats. He announced his retirement this year.

  • When did I know that this current Congress would be rough? Election Night 2010. I thought in late November and December, in the lame duck after the 2010 election, I thought the Obama administration was wildly unrealistic about how it could get along with the new Congress. They?d been inside the Beltway bubble and had no idea how extreme the Tea Party folks were, and that part of the Tea Party ethic was: Never compromise. They felt betrayed by people like Bob Bennett, Dick Lugar, Lisa Murkowski, and even Orrin Hatch?though he?s changed that tendency?who compromise.
  • After the election, House Democrats had a conference meeting, Biden was there and so was Jack Lew. Their argument was: If we don?t extend all the Bush tax cuts, we?ll stall the economy, which is standard Keynesian economics. I thought they were realistic about that. But Republicans were willing to cut spending and hurt the economy even more. I voted against the extension because Republicans were going to come and begin making cuts through continuing resolutions that would do more to contract the economy than extending the tax cuts would expand it. And then I remember asking Biden: We also know we?re going to bump up against the debt ceiling. The usual pattern is that the majority grind their teeth, posture, and pass it. I said, what are we gonna do? The world as we know it will end if the debt ceiling is not extended. We don?t have an agreement. Biden?s response was: ?Oh, they won?t be that irresponsible. They?ll know they can?t do that. They won?t use the extension to make cuts to programs that we favor.? I thought: I?m not sure of that. I don?t think you?ve been with these people.
  • I was disappointed the Obama administration didn?t come out and say, in good times we should cut spending, but not now. Instead, the Obama administration picked up the argument: Yes, we need to reduce the deficit, and the question is how. The argument that might have come in handy was that one reason the economy isn?t doing better is because of the cuts Republicans made. But that economic argument is hard to make in the context of politics. Most people instinctively think that the federal government should be run like a household.
  • Demographically, if not philosophically, I?m a Blue Dog. I know a lot of the conservative Democrats because I?m like them. I?ve had more beers and watched more ball games with them than with the progressive crowd. When the Blue Dogs voted against Democratic bills, a lot of it was political calculation. They had tougher districts and were trying to figure out how votes would be used against them. On meaningless procedural votes, Blue Dogs would think about those stats and ratings that show how often you broke with the party. They?d try to drive those numbers down so it would be harder to tie them to Pelosi, to Obama. When health care passed, the Democrats who voted against it did not base it on a real detailed policy argument?tweak this, tweak that. It was to stave off the people demanding they vote against ?socialized health care.? They frequently adopted Republican rhetoric to explain their votes.
  • FDR didn?t address Social Security in the first 100 days. He focused on the Great Depression, and Democrats actually expanded their majorities in the 1934 election. A realignment isn?t one election, it?s three elections. After the third election, people can look and say: Yes, that?s what we want. I thought that was a good model for us. If we had worked on the housing crisis first and the fiscal crisis first, then we would have been in a strong position, the midterms would have gone differently, and we could have passed health care reform in 2011. I?ve said this before and gotten some crap from progressives.
  • A big driver of recovery, in the past, has been the housing market. The number of jobs lost in the housing industry was something like 1 million. Now, think about how angry people were when AIG gave out those bonuses. It looked like that spooked the White House. But if we?d taken that anger and directed it, which is a fair thing to do in politics, it would have been hard to resist it. Think if we?d directed that to housing. The economy would have done better. The American people would have thought: They?re standing up to powerful people, for us.

Source: http://feeds.slate.com/click.phdo?i=9fc467e9b6ffa4aefdc2b717fed808c0

solicitor general neighborhood watch dennis rodman dodgers sale tami roman jetblue captain los angeles dodgers

Energy independence for fossil fuels? There's no such thing.

In a world energy market, where companies seek the highest profits, far-away events affect domestic prices.?

By Kurt Cobb,?Guest blogger / December 27, 2012

Malta-flagged Iranian crude oil supertanker 'Delvar' is seen anchored off the coast of Singapore in this March file photo. Western sanctions have depressed Iranian oil sales and prices.

Tim Chong/Reuters/File

Enlarge

Anyone who tells you that energy independence can be achieved based on globally traded commodities such as oil, coal and natural gas is either trying to mislead you or doesn't understand the structure of energy markets. As of 2011 fossil fuels produced 83 percent of the world's energy according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Because fossil fuels can be transported anywhere in the world, producers seek out the highest price unless they are constrained by law or infrastructure from doing so.

Skip to next paragraph Resource Insights

Kurt Cobb?is the author of the peak-oil-themed thriller, 'Prelude,' and a columnist for the Paris-based science news site Scitizen.?He is a founding member of the Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas?USA, and he serves on the board of the Arthur Morgan Institute for Community Solutions. For more of his Resource Insights posts, click?here.

Recent posts

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

This means that energy independence for a country is something of an optical illusion when it is based merely on the domestic production of fossil fuels. Here's why:

  1. Events far away such as wars; embargoes; strikes; and mine, oilfield and refinery disasters affect the level of domestic prices for fossil fuels in all countries where these fuels are freely exportable regardless of whether that country produces enough for its own consumption. In such countries consumers of these fuels including domestic industry and transportation, commercial establishments, households and government agencies are all subjected to fluctuating world prices that can be unrelated to anything happening in the host country even if the country extracts enough fossil fuel from its own soil to meet domestic demand.

Wednesday, December 26, 2012

The Benefits Of Pay Per Click In Online Business | Lakeshore ...

PPC or pay per click is basically one SEO solution in which the advertiser uses this system to advertise the products and services they offer by placing ads on various blogs or websites that have high traffic. If you are a businessman and want to increase your sales traffic, you can use a pay per click system where you just need to pay the webmaster or the managers of websites and blogs on every click made by visitors. So in other words, it would not hurt for you to pay the webmaster for every one buyer, considering that the cost per click type of marketing system is very cheap and affordable, even companies as big as Google offer a service of this type with a very affordable cost range of about one hundred thousand dollars not limited to monthly, depending on how many request.

Some of the popular ppc marketing companies in the online business world today include Google Adsense, Bidvertiser, LinkShare, Chitika, Media.net, AdBrite, Clickbank, Kontera, eBay, Amazon, Infolinks. The listed companies above can become an alternative to generate income for your business. The registration process is easy, just enter your email, verify, register web/blog and select the type of ad you want to show, whether it?s ad text or mini banner ads. You can go to the company website and just register. As for the advertiser, the company will present the media to promote your business and products in such a way that they are very effective and profitable. In this type of SEO, advertisers will then pay for each one unique IP address that clicks on the creative/promotional/publishing/advertising spread on blogs in the network ppc marketing company, this is to avoid the click- fraud/click-abuse.

From the explanation above, we can see that this system has the potential to become an effective marketing campaign for increasing sales traffic of a company and, at the same time, it?s also quite cheap and affordable enough for business owners to optimize their profits by simply removing the capital for the promotion and advertising costs. Pay per click system not only offers a solution to the businessman but also allows websites to make money through advertising. However, if you work individually you?ll need a lot of clicks to make a lot of money because the price for every single click is about $ 0.01 to $ 0.03. So you need thousands or millions of clicks if you want to become rich through pay per click. But you do not need to fear because companies using pay per click systems usually have other affiliates. By referring others as marketing affiliates, you will get a percentage of the profits your affiliates make, so the more affiliates you have the more money you can make.

About the Author

Emma Morgain is a Freelance writer who writes informative & creative articles for PPC Company USA and Technology. Her area of expertise is in writing articles related to SEO, PPC, SMM, etc.


Stay Connected, Subscribe to the Lakeshore Branding blog feed via RSS, email and you can follow Lakeshore Branding on Twitter!

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Source: http://www.lakeshorebranding.com/company/blog/the-benefits-of-pay-per-click-in-online-business/

north korea news giuliana and bill giuliana and bill bill rancic nflx jennifer hudson chicago blackhawks

Monday, December 24, 2012

NRA: 'Armed officers in every school' (CNN)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories News, News Feeds and News via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/272739429?client_source=feed&format=rss

Lisa Robin Kelly Nexus 4 Girl Meets World Jason Babin Nolan Daniels angus t. jones monday night football

Opt-In Email List Building And Copywriting For Profits | Internet ...

For most people, working a 9 to 5 job is something that they don't like to do. Instead, they want to own their own business, and stop earning a small fixed income. So they migrate to the online world and try their hand at an online business.

Tags: internet marketing booth, internetmarketing booth

Source: http://internetmarketingbooth.com/blog/76536/opt-in-email-list-building-and-copywriting-for-profits-2/

marshawn lynch earthquake bay area clear channel drexel dale george will obama birth certificate

Friday, December 21, 2012

Barcelona coach Vilanova has 2nd throat operation

By JOSEPH WILSON

Associated Press

Associated Press Sports

updated 11:00 a.m. ET Dec. 20, 2012

BARCELONA, Spain (AP) -Barcelona coach Tito Vilanova underwent throat surgery on Thursday to treat the reappearance of a tumor on a saliva gland.

The Spanish club said his progress will mark his hospital stay, and his doctors were maintaining their plans of treating Vilanova with chemotherapy and radiotherapy for up to six weeks.

Barcelona captain Carles Puyol said "the operation went well."

Barcelona made the announcement that Vilanova had fallen ill again on Wednesday.

The club said Vilanova might be able to return to the sidelines while continuing his treatment. It did not provide a timetable for his return.

In the meantime, Vilanova's assistant coach, Jordi Roura, has taken over training and will coach the team for Saturday's Spanish league game at Valladolid. Roura has been on Barcelona's coaching staff since 2009.

"Yesterday was a hard day, but (Vilanova) came to the dressing room and explained everything to us and boosted our spirits," Puyol said. "He hadn't even left yet and he was saying he couldn't wait to be back. Today we feel better because the news is good.

"We have to keep playing the same way, train as hard as we can, (and) look forward to (Vilanova's) return."

Puyol said the club's decision to let Roura take over for now was the correct one.

"He has been working with us for years. He knows the team perfectly," Puyol said. "Our way of doing things won't change. We are in good hands."

The 44-year-old Vilanova had surgery to remove a tumor from a saliva gland in November 2011 when he was Pep Guardiola's assistant at the club.

Vilanova had chemotherapy and radiotherapy at that time and returned to the squad in 15 days, ahead of schedule.

He took over for Guardiola at the end of last season after five seasons as his assistant, four with the first team and one with the B team.

Under Vilanova's guidance, Barcelona has made its best ever start to a season, winning a Spanish record 15 of its first 16 league games. The club leads the standings with 46 points, nine ahead of Atletico Madrid and 13 in front of defending champion Real Madrid.

Barcelona is also the favorite for this season's Champions League. On Thursday, Barcelona drew AC Milan in the first knockout round. The opening leg of their two-game tie will be played in Italy on Feb. 20.

The announcement of Vilanova's ailment on Wednesday coincided with the return of defender Eric Abidal to his first team practice since undergoing a liver transplant eight months before.

Previously, Abidal had to have a liver tumor removed in March 2011, but he made a speedy recovery before it was discovered that he needed the transplant.

Puyol said Abidal's second return was a boost, especially with the health of their coach again in doubt.

"These are always tough blows. You are never prepared," Puyol said. "The example of Abi, who can already play again, gives strength to the entire group."

? 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


advertisement

More newsAFP - Getty Images
Doesn't matter who's coach

Opinion: Even if Lionel Messi and his Barcelona teammates had no coach to guide them, you'd think hard about betting against perhaps the greatest team ever.

Source: http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/45398872/ns/sports-soccer/

palestine powerball winner powerball winner jessica simpson Zig Ziglar lunar eclipse alabama football